Friday, 2020-05-22

*** cp- has quit IRC00:25
*** cp- has joined #edge-computing-group00:26
*** gfidente has joined #edge-computing-group08:03
*** jonaspaulo has joined #edge-computing-group12:12
*** jonaspaulo has quit IRC12:31
*** fultonj has joined #edge-computing-group13:47
gfidentehi I was looking at the planning doc for next ptg as I was curious to learn more about possible scenarios to have object/store at the edge14:03
gfidentecouldn't find much in the etherpad though14:05
gfidenteis this a topic somebody started looking into already?14:07
gfidenteif not I'ld be happy to start a conversation around that at the ptg to hear some feedback14:12
gfidenteildikov ^^ not sure if you know more about the agenda and can help with this?14:14
ildikovgfidente: hi14:14
ildikovgfidente: as a matter of fact we have not had a chat about that yet, but I would be happy to add that to the agenda14:15
gfidenteildikov hey thanks, that'd be nice14:15
fultonjthanks ildikov14:16
ildikovgfidente: I personally didn't come across a lot of requirements on that topic while exploring use cases14:16
gfidenteildikov oh okay that was one of the questions I had indeed14:16
ildikovgfidente: do you mind adding the topic and your name and/or IRC nick to it? I think it could fit under the reference architectures session on Monday for instance14:16
gfidenteQ: do you think that is more because usually object-storage in central site is good enough for the job, or because the actual workload rarely uses object-storage?14:17
ildikovgfidente: we can ask it again as we may have people showing up at the PTG session who haven't attended the working group calls, etc14:17
ildikovgfidente: I think it's more about the workload14:17
gfidenteildikov ok understood, is there someone else usually participates into the group we should be pinging?14:18
ildikovgfidente: with that said I've been in contact with people more from the telecommunications area and a bit of industrial IoT so I don't have the full spectrum of edge workloads14:18
gfidenteto sync up before ptg I mean14:19
ildikovgfidente: questions are focusing more on how to manage the architecture, how to run those workloads, whether they are VMs or containers, etc and we didn't go into "details" like object storage14:20
ildikovgfidente: csatari and dpaterson are regulars regarding the working group activities14:20
gfidenteok that's a lot of info already14:21
ildikovgfidente: anyhow, I'm happy to add the topic to the agenda and see if we have people at the PTG who can share requirements with you14:21
gfidenterequirements yes but also, like it happened for glance a couple of ptgs ago now, ideas how would be best to attempt the deployment of the service itself14:22
ildikovgfidente: we can also talk about how it could fit into the architecture models14:22
gfidenteyeah that14:23
ildikov+114:23
gfidenteok thanks I am putting some lines in the etherpad directly then, including some questions hoping those can help drive conversation14:25
ildikovgfidente: please add al the questions and topics that you would like to discuss. I will clean up the etherpad towards the end of next week to make the agenda clear and will probably create separate etherpads for the three main blocks14:25
gfidente++14:25
gfidentesame thing, thanks14:25
ildikovme thanks! :)14:26
*** gfidente is now known as gfidente|afk18:11
*** gfidente|afk has quit IRC18:21
*** quassel has quit IRC19:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!