| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** akhil_jain has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** spsurya has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** aspiers has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** gmann has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** gnuoy has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** zigo has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** zigo has joined #congress | 01:43 | |
| *** gmann has joined #congress | 01:44 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #congress | 01:44 | |
| *** akhil_jain has joined #congress | 01:45 | |
| *** gnuoy has joined #congress | 01:46 | |
| *** aspiers has joined #congress | 02:01 | |
| openstackgerrit | Akhil jain proposed openstack/congress master: Add python 3.6 for test in tox https://review.openstack.org/607831 | 04:39 |
|---|---|---|
| *** masahito has joined #congress | 04:41 | |
| *** spsurya has joined #congress | 04:43 | |
| openstackgerrit | Akhil jain proposed openstack/congress master: Add python 3.6 for test in tox https://review.openstack.org/607831 | 04:47 |
| *** masahito has quit IRC | 05:22 | |
| *** masahito has joined #congress | 05:22 | |
| *** masahito has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
| *** masahito has joined #congress | 06:14 | |
| *** masahito has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
| *** caterfx has joined #congress | 18:32 | |
| caterfx | The question of 'who decides what is acceptible sexual contact' is transitioning from a one-party-consent to a two-party-consent agreement. It seems obvious to me that Grassley and the Republicans are trying to halt the redefinition of what is and what is not acceptible criticism in a professional setting simply because they themselves or people who they know would stand to lose from such a | 18:50 |
| caterfx | redefinition, and possibly lose greatly, as well as from any serious investigation of their own lives. Meaning, that some of them have probably committed, at some time in their lives, actions that would now be considered serious sexual assault. Which is to say that, were anyone to have said something like, 'under the new consent agreement, the Republicans are fighting to protect sexual predators,' | 18:50 |
| caterfx | while such a statement may or may not be verifiably true, it also wouldn't be false. 'Do you care whether you hurt somebody' is a basic test of conscience. Grassley and the Republicans on the Judiciary Cmte have voted for less compassionate choice, not the more compassionate one. When has history look favorably upon such open callous disregard? | 18:51 |
| *** caterfx has quit IRC | 20:07 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!