Tuesday, 2020-08-25

openstackgerritRishabh Kumar Jain proposed airship/airshipctl master: Integrate CAPD Zuul Gate Scripts---- Work in Progress (WIP)  https://review.opendev.org/73868200:11
openstackgerritRishabh Kumar Jain proposed airship/airshipctl master: Integrate CAPD Zuul Gate Scripts  https://review.opendev.org/73868200:14
openstackgerritRick Bartra proposed airship/shipyard master: DNM WIP - SY update_site debug  https://review.opendev.org/74697701:37
openstackgerritRick Bartra proposed airship/shipyard master: DNM WIP - SY update_site debug  https://review.opendev.org/74697702:51
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: Extend kubeconfig interface for document bundle  https://review.opendev.org/73652304:22
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Add kubeconfig builder clusterctl move  https://review.opendev.org/74781804:22
*** evrardjp has quit IRC04:33
*** evrardjp has joined #airshipit04:35
openstackgerritRuslan Aliev proposed airship/airshipctl master: Refactor cluster status command  https://review.opendev.org/74684404:58
*** uzumaki has joined #airshipit05:17
openstackgerritPhil Sphicas proposed airship/pegleg master: Use LibYAML  https://review.opendev.org/74751806:26
openstackgerritPhil Sphicas proposed airship/pegleg master: DNM - LibYAML test  https://review.opendev.org/74752206:26
openstackgerritSmruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed airship/maas master: [WIP]Disable Avahi  https://review.opendev.org/74742306:55
openstackgerritSirisha Gopigiri proposed airship/hostconfig-operator master: WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig repository  https://review.opendev.org/74767506:57
*** devfaz has left #airshipit07:10
openstackgerritPhil Sphicas proposed airship/pegleg master: Use LibYAML  https://review.opendev.org/74751807:34
openstackgerritPhil Sphicas proposed airship/pegleg master: DNM - LibYAML test  https://review.opendev.org/74752207:34
*** uzumaki has quit IRC08:34
*** uzumaki has joined #airshipit08:58
openstackgerritSmruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed airship/maas master: [WIP]Disable Avahi  https://review.opendev.org/74742309:19
openstackgerritSmruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed airship/maas master: Disable Avahi Deamon  https://review.opendev.org/74742309:20
*** ianychoi__ has joined #airshipit09:21
*** ianychoi_ has quit IRC09:24
openstackgerritSmruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed airship/maas master: Disable Avahi Daemon  https://review.opendev.org/74742309:26
*** uzumaki has quit IRC10:03
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed airship/airshipctl master: Extend kubeconfig interface for document bundle  https://review.opendev.org/73652310:20
*** howell has quit IRC10:49
*** ildikov has quit IRC10:49
*** iamweswilson has quit IRC10:50
*** rpioso has quit IRC10:50
*** aprice has quit IRC10:50
*** jayahn has quit IRC10:51
*** srwilkers has quit IRC10:52
*** srwilkers has joined #airshipit10:59
*** howell has joined #airshipit10:59
*** rpioso has joined #airshipit10:59
*** iamweswilson has joined #airshipit11:00
*** aprice has joined #airshipit11:05
*** jayahn has joined #airshipit11:06
*** ildikov has joined #airshipit11:10
openstackgerritSirisha Gopigiri proposed airship/hostconfig-operator master: WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig repository  https://review.opendev.org/74767512:19
openstackgerritSirisha Gopigiri proposed airship/hostconfig-operator master: WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig repository  https://review.opendev.org/74767512:25
airship-irc-bot2<ankitg> Hello,  We are facing an issue with airship in a bottle setup. After successful deployment of Openstack via Airship, the public network which gets created by default is not reachable from the Openstack host itself. Thus when we create a VM on openstack and assign a floating point IP which is from the same public network subnet is not pingable from the host. Openstack VMs are not reachable from host and vice versa.   The default12:34
airship-irc-bot2configuration should be working as it is without any manual implementation.  We tried changing some network configurations to fix this, but nothing worked.  Thus, We need help on how we can resolve this issue.12:34
*** SRao has joined #airshipit13:01
*** vdrok has quit IRC13:02
*** vdrok has joined #airshipit13:02
openstackgerritSreejith Punnapuzha proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Enhance target node deployment on gates  https://review.opendev.org/73869613:19
*** KeithMnemonic has joined #airshipit13:22
openstackgerritRoman Gorshunov proposed airship/divingbell master: Fix undefined variable in Zuul ansible job  https://review.opendev.org/74490813:39
openstackgerritRoman Gorshunov proposed airship/divingbell master: Add documentation to docs.airshipit.org  https://review.opendev.org/73536613:42
openstackgerritSirisha Gopigiri proposed airship/hostconfig-operator master: WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig repository  https://review.opendev.org/74767513:43
mattmceuenHi everyone, agenda for our meeting coming up in 10min:  https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/airship-meeting-2020-08-2513:49
mattmceuenankitg: we can discuss your issue in the upcoming meeting if you're still around?13:49
openstackgerritSirisha Gopigiri proposed airship/hostconfig-operator master: WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig repository  https://review.opendev.org/74767513:49
*** sreejithp has joined #airshipit13:50
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> @ankitg ^^13:50
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Add kubeconfig builder clusterctl move  https://review.opendev.org/74781813:51
*** roman_g has joined #airshipit13:53
openstackgerritSmruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed airship/maas master: Disable Avahi Daemon  https://review.opendev.org/74742313:56
mattmceuen#startmeeting airship14:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 25 14:00:37 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mattmceuen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: airship)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'airship'14:00
mattmceuen#topic Rollcall14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Rollcall (Meeting topic: airship)"14:00
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> o/14:00
mattmceuenGood morning / evening everyone, welcome to our team meeting!14:00
mattmceuenhttps://etherpad.opendev.org/p/airship-meeting-2020-08-25 <- agenda14:00
airship-irc-bot2<mb551n> o/14:00
airship-irc-bot2<ak3216> o/14:01
airship-irc-bot2<ih616h> o/14:01
mattmceuenplease add anything you'd like to talk about today14:01
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> o/14:01
airship-irc-bot2<james.gu> o/14:01
mattmceuen#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/airship-meeting-2020-08-2514:01
airship-irc-bot2<mf4716> o/14:01
airship-irc-bot2<lb4368> o/14:01
roman_go/14:02
mattmceuenOk, let's get started:14:02
mattmceuen#topic Announcements14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: airship)"14:02
mattmceuenThe Open Infra Summit and PTG will both be virtual, and in back-to-back weeks in October this year14:02
mattmceuenPart of the Summit (IMO - the most valuable part) is the cross-team Forums14:03
mattmceuenForums follow a similar, but slightly less formal, proposal format compared to summit talks14:03
mattmceuenThe submission window for Forums will be Aug 31 - Sept14 -- so please think of / propose any good cross-team discussion opportunities.  I.e. on topics that are shared across different projects14:04
mattmceuenCould be different projects that work together, or, could just be different projects that could learn from each other14:04
*** dwalt has joined #airshipit14:05
mattmceuenFor the PTG -- I added Airship sessions on the calendar for Wednesday, Oct 28 and Thursday Oct 29, 13:00-17:00 UTC (8-noon US central)14:05
mattmceuenAs the PTG draws near, we can draft up an agenda14:05
mattmceuenIf those times aren't good for folks, please let me know14:06
mattmceuenThat's all I have for announcements - any questions/comments on the above^?14:06
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/open-infrastructure-summit-2020-tickets-96967218561 #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-october-2020-tickets-116136313841  both the PTG and Summit are free to register for using links above14:06
mattmceuenthanks Alex14:07
mattmceuenAlright, moving on:14:07
mattmceuen#topic Proposal: make community meeting bi-weekly, and cancel the day beforehand if there are no items on the agenda14:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Proposal: make community meeting bi-weekly, and cancel the day beforehand if there are no items on the agenda (Meeting topic: airship)"14:07
mattmceuenThis was an idea from the working committee, based on the fact that our agendas have been pretty light for this meeting recently14:08
mattmceuenalthough I'm happy to meet every week, we also wanted to be respectful of everyone's time, especially from other timezone14:08
mattmceuenHow would everyone feel about making this meeting bi-weekly?14:08
openstackgerritDrew Walters proposed airship/treasuremap v2: DNM: Testing CI  https://review.opendev.org/74795814:09
sreejithpo/14:09
mattmceuenOr, if anyone would prefer weekly, please speak now or forever hold your peace ;-)14:09
airship-irc-bot2<mf4716> +1 @mattmceuen - for making meetings bi-weekly14:09
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> if we have nothing to discuss absolutely cancel.  I think we can do better with sharing the agenda though regardless of frequency we could start linking "next meeting agenda" in the current meeting etherpad, and sharing at the end of each meeting during round table14:10
airship-irc-bot2<ak3216> +1 bi-weekly is fine with me14:10
mattmceuen+114:10
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> +1 bi-weekly14:10
airship-irc-bot2<ih616h> +114:10
dwaltThat's a good idea alexanderhughes. I also like what OSH does. One rolling agenda like the design calls14:10
mattmceuenSounds like a plan!  A lot of the discussion has simply moved into the design meetings, but this IRC meeting is still very helpful for non-design kinds of topics14:10
mattmceuenYeah, that's a very good idea14:11
mattmceuenBecause it could be a one stop shop for "agenda" and "when was the next meeting, I forget"14:11
dwalt++. And we don't have to recreate it ;)14:11
mattmceuen:D14:12
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> agree, just want to make sure people know where the agenda is prior to 30m leading up to meeting.  if our plan is to cancel a day before we want to people to be able to easily find agenda to put things on it before Mondays14:12
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> clarifying: cancel if no agenda topics the day before14:12
mattmceuenYes, agree.  I'll put a recurring item on my Calendar to check the agenda, and will send out a note on the ML with the updated schedule14:13
mattmceuenWe can try it and pivot back to more meetings if/when needed14:13
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> +114:13
mattmceuenOk, sounds good!  Along the same lines:14:14
mattmceuen#topic Any other feedback on how to make this meeting valuable?14:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Any other feedback on how to make this meeting valuable? (Meeting topic: airship)"14:14
mattmceuenYou guys got a head start on this one already with the rolling agenda :)14:14
mattmceuenanything else that would be valuable to y'all?  Other topics to discuss, or changes we can make to how this meeting is run?14:14
openstackgerritdiwakar thyagaraj proposed airship/porthole master: Upgrade Kubectl to 1.18.6  https://review.opendev.org/74777214:15
mattmceuenWe have a "Community Feedback" standing item in the agenda, which I think has been used exactly zero times14:15
mattmceuenso if you think of any other improvements, please do share them14:16
mattmceuenAnything else before we move on?14:16
mattmceuen#topic Airship in a Bottle issue14:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Airship in a Bottle issue (Meeting topic: airship)"14:17
mattmceuen@ankitg raised an issue this morning on Airship 1's AIAB all-in-one demo project14:17
mattmceuen<ankitg> Hello,  We are facing an issue with airship in a bottle setup. After successful deployment of Openstack via Airship, the public network which gets created by default is not reachable from the Openstack host itself. Thus when we create a VM on openstack and assign a floating point IP which is from the same public network subnet is not pingable from the host. Openstack VMs are not reachable from host and14:17
mattmceuenvice versa.   The default configuration should be working as it is without any manual implementation.  We tried changing some network configurations to fix this, but nothing worked.  Thus, We need help on how we can resolve this issue.14:17
mattmceuenDo we have ankitg here still?14:17
mattmceuenThen I'll ask more broadly, has anyone /tried/ running airship in a bottle recently?14:18
mattmceuenI think it's fair to ask ourselves, do we want to support AIAB anymore?  It was always "extra work" to keep it up to date14:19
mattmceuenAnd the use case for it was "new interested devs/operators" -- today I think we'd steer those folks toward Airship 214:19
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> I have not, but I know the team has been working hard on Airship in a Pod.  I think that should be our focus rather than AIAB support for new devs/operators14:20
mattmceuen+114:20
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> would it be possible to get a 'frozen in time' release of AIAB together?14:20
mattmceuenairship in a tightly corked bottle14:21
mattmceuenI'd need to look at all the pinning that's in place -- that would certainly be ideal14:21
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> ++ it would if possible be preferable to full abandonment14:21
mattmceuenAgree.  An assessment of AIAB should be done to see if it can be permanetently pinned.  Are any Airship 1-focused developers here who would be willing to take that as an action item?14:22
mattmceuenI'll take it as an action item to raise this on the ML so that more devs see it; I think someone up-to-speed on Airship 1 would be in the best position to run with this14:24
mattmceuenOk, one final topic:14:24
mattmceuen#topic airship v2.0 kubeconfig14:25
*** openstack changes topic to "airship v2.0 kubeconfig (Meeting topic: airship)"14:25
mattmceuenairship v2.0 kubeconfig when two contexts are needed, clusterctl move, deployment of cluster object and waiting for nodes, managing workload cluster (where kubeconfig comes from remote cluster)14:25
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> hi, that’s more tech design topoc14:25
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> i have created, since we did n’t have time on design call, so i thought i get some input in it14:25
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> form here14:25
mattmceuensure thing14:26
mattmceuenCan you elaborate a bit more on it? :)14:26
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so when working with kubernetes we have 3 corner cases where we actually do need 2 kubeconfigs: 1. Clusterctl move 2. managing workload cluster, we don’t have kubeconfig of workload cluster localy, its pulled from parent cluster, which is target in our default case 3. waiting for nodes on workload cluster to become ready, after applying cluster-api `cluster`  object14:27
openstackgerritSirisha Gopigiri proposed airship/hostconfig-operator master: WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig repository  https://review.opendev.org/74767514:28
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so if we store the kubeconfig inside the document model or take them from kubernetes cluster that hosts cluster-api components, for those corner cases, we need to somehow provide both kubeconfig for target and workload cluster14:28
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> or provide single kubeconfig, but need to identify a context which one is for partent and which one is for actual workload cluster (or target)14:29
mattmceuenHow do we feed that into airshipctl's clusterctl move today?14:29
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> only in command line `flag`14:30
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so that’s like a workaround to make sure it workds for now14:30
mattmceuenyeah makes sense14:30
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> before we come up with more generic way, which i am trying to do now14:30
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> will this not also become more common, if airship grows to be able to manage multiple workload clusters?14:30
mattmceuen+114:30
mattmceuenworthy of ease-of-use support, because of that use case.  It won't just be a "day 1" action14:31
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> todays corner, tomorrows wall?14:31
mattmceuenlol14:31
airship-irc-bot2<ankitg> Hello , I just the messages14:32
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> multiple contexts in a single kubeconfig sounds appealing here14:32
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> but would need to mull on it14:32
airship-irc-bot2<ankitg> Can someone help me to fix the issue in my AIAB14:32
mattmceuenhey @ankitg - no worries - yep we're looking for someone to help with that, and will follow up on the mailing list14:32
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> @pb269f yes,i am trying to exercise a generic approach, so it’s not treated like cordner case14:33
airship-irc-bot2<ankitg> Thanks @mattmceuen14:34
mattmceuen@kk6740, all of these operations still feel like things you're doing against the management cluster, right?14:36
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so i created a small approach, where each phase has field cluster, and this way we know where we are applying it14:36
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> and cluster has a parent, if parent is needed14:36
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so basically, the executor, can find a parent cluster, and request the workload cluster kubeconfig from it14:37
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> i have tried different aproaches, but it seems that we must have the relationship to parent cluster somewhere14:37
mattmceuenso basically, each phase would have a pointer to where to get its kubeconfig from -- in the "move" case etc it would be "from the management cluster"?14:37
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> makes sense i think - so (and i know im jumping ahead a bit here) you could have multiple 'workload' phses, but attached to different clusters?14:38
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> you may have different workload phases for different clusters14:38
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747818/2/pkg/api/v1alpha1/phase_types.go14:38
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> this is how it would look like, i imagine14:38
openstackgerritVrushali proposed airship/treasuremap v2: ----WIP -- Building Zuul Gates for hostconfig-operator on treasuremap: v2 branch.  https://review.opendev.org/74796514:39
airship-irc-bot2<pb269f> hmm - def a topic for the design calls - but i think this looks sane14:39
mattmceuenWhat would the logic in airshipctl be for "where do I find my kubeconfig"?14:39
mattmceuenSince it could come from several different places after this change14:40
mattmceuenfrom a cluster, from a file in the manifest structure, from an arbitrary filesystem file...14:40
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so i used a builder pattern, for that. we simply shove all we have into builder, and then tell it build(), and its going to go through an algorithm, which will check if flags are defined14:40
mattmceuencool.  that sounds good to me too in principle!14:41
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747818/2/pkg/phase/phase.go - lines 149-15414:41
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> so kubeconfig comes from flag, use it as is14:41
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> then if it has parrent, and we are allowed to use dynamic kubeconfig (from parent), we use that14:42
mattmceuenare you planning to bring this up again on Thursday's design meeting @kk6740?14:42
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> yes, i will try, just wanted to get some feedback before14:42
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> if that seems alirght14:42
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> i can proceed and try to make a demo14:43
openstackgerritVrushali proposed airship/treasuremap v2: ----WIP --  https://review.opendev.org/74796514:43
mattmceuenSounds like a good potential path forward to me :)  thanks for bringing it up14:43
mattmceuenOk, unless there are any final thoughts on the kubeconfig topic, I think we can move on:14:44
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> we can move on14:44
mattmceuen#topic Review Requests & Roundtable14:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Requests & Roundtable (Meeting topic: airship)"14:44
mattmceuen    https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738410/  <- add Hardware Classification Controller function to airshipctl14:44
mattmceuenThis one^ adds a function to airshipctl for Metal3's Hardware Classification Controller14:44
mattmceuenIt doesn't contain any site integration or gating yet, but that's planned for a follow-on changeset14:45
mattmceuenAny other review requests?14:45
mattmceuenOther roundtable topics today?14:46
mattmceuenAlright, then I think we can adjourn - good meeting, thanks everybody!14:47
dwaltthank you!14:47
mattmceuen#endmeeting14:47
*** openstack changes topic to "https://opendev.org/airship || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Airship || https://review.opendev.org/#/q/projects:airship+status:open+NOT+label:Verified%253D-1+NOT+label:Workflow%253D-1+NOT+message:DNM+NOT+message:WIP"14:47
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 25 14:47:37 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2020/airship.2020-08-25-14.00.html14:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2020/airship.2020-08-25-14.00.txt14:47
airship-irc-bot2<mf4716> thanks @mattmceuen - thanks all!14:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2020/airship.2020-08-25-14.00.log.html14:47
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> thanks!14:47
airship-irc-bot2<mf4716> Make it a Great Day everyone!14:47
openstackgerritSreejith Punnapuzha proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Enhance target node deployment on gates  https://review.opendev.org/73869614:49
openstackgerritSreejith Punnapuzha proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Enhance target node deployment on gates  https://review.opendev.org/73869614:50
openstackgerritVrushali proposed airship/treasuremap v2: ----WIP --  https://review.opendev.org/74796515:17
openstackgerritMerged airship/airshipctl master: Extend kubeconfig interface for document bundle  https://review.opendev.org/73652315:46
openstackgerritSreejith Punnapuzha proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Enhance target node deployment on gates  https://review.opendev.org/73869615:49
openstackgerritAndrew Schiefelbein proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] improve logging  https://review.opendev.org/74774315:51
airship-irc-bot2<j_t_williams> Wow!, an exciting meeting today.  A lot of material to catch up on ...16:17
airship-irc-bot2<ankitg> @mattmceuen Do i need to raise any jira ticket for tracking purpose. I raised one against Airship project but got a comment that i should close it and raise one against Openstack Airship project.16:19
airship-irc-bot2<mattmceuen> @alexander.hughes was an issue getting created in the community for @ankitg’s issue?  I know someone was going to work it, but wasn't sure if it would be tracked in github/storyboard or not16:22
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> yes, let me see where it's being tracked and get back to you16:23
airship-irc-bot2<mattmceuen> thanks16:24
airship-irc-bot2<mattmceuen> @ankitg be aware though that airship in a bottle is demonstrating an Airship 1 stack, while new development is being focused on Airship 216:24
airship-irc-bot2<mattmceuen> So if you're just getting started with Airship, you might be interested in Airship 2, since it's the target state16:25
airship-irc-bot2<mattmceuen> If you want to work with existing deployments, Airship 1 is the way to go, since it's what's in production today16:25
*** roman_g has quit IRC16:38
airship-irc-bot2<alexander.hughes> @mattmceuen @ankitg AIAB is being tracked under https://github.com/airshipit/treasuremap/issues/2916:54
*** dwalt has quit IRC16:55
airship-irc-bot2<mattmceuen> Thanks @alexander.hughes16:58
openstackgerritdiwakar thyagaraj proposed airship/promenade master: Upgrade etcd to 3.4.3  https://review.opendev.org/74798917:24
openstackgerritSirajudeen proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] - Deploy calico via function.  https://review.opendev.org/74376317:34
openstackgerritdiwakar thyagaraj proposed airship/treasuremap master: [WIP] Uplift etcd to 3.4.3  https://review.opendev.org/74799317:43
openstackgerritdiwakar thyagaraj proposed airship/porthole master: Upgrade etcd to 3.4.3  https://review.opendev.org/74799417:47
*** dwalt has joined #airshipit18:26
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Testing phases  https://review.opendev.org/74731418:34
*** howell has quit IRC18:49
*** aprice has quit IRC18:49
*** srwilkers has quit IRC18:49
*** ildikov has quit IRC18:50
*** ildikov has joined #airshipit18:52
*** srwilkers has joined #airshipit18:52
*** howell has joined #airshipit18:53
*** iamweswilson has quit IRC18:53
*** aprice has joined #airshipit18:54
*** iamweswilson has joined #airshipit18:54
openstackgerritDrew Walters proposed airship/treasuremap v2: Update airshipctl VM config playbooks  https://review.opendev.org/74801619:00
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Add kubeconfig builder clusterctl move  https://review.opendev.org/74781819:04
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Add kubeconfig builder clusterctl move  https://review.opendev.org/74781819:05
openstackgerritAndrew Schiefelbein proposed airship/airshipui master: [WIP] add auth login page and related functionality  https://review.opendev.org/74801719:29
*** kberger_ has joined #airshipit19:39
*** kberger_ has quit IRC19:40
*** kberger_ has joined #airshipit19:40
*** KeithMnemonic has quit IRC19:41
openstackgerritSirajudeen proposed airship/airshipctl master: Deploy calico via function.  https://review.opendev.org/74376319:54
openstackgerritMatthew Fuller proposed airship/airshipui master: [WIP] Lazy load phases  https://review.opendev.org/74802019:54
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Add kubeconfig builder clusterctl move  https://review.opendev.org/74781820:00
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Add kubeconfig builder clusterctl move  https://review.opendev.org/74781820:12
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Testing phases v2  https://review.opendev.org/74802920:42
openstackgerritMerged airship/treasuremap v2: Update airshipctl VM config playbooks  https://review.opendev.org/74801620:50
openstackgerritUday Ruddarraju proposed airship/airshipctl master: DNM: Adding support for airshipctl encryption and decryption using sops  https://review.opendev.org/74269520:51
openstackgerritDrew Walters proposed airship/treasuremap v2: Fix test-site reference to target/initinfra phase  https://review.opendev.org/74746720:51
openstackgerritDrew Walters proposed airship/treasuremap v2: Add helm-operator to initinfra target phase  https://review.opendev.org/74742720:51
openstackgerritDrew Walters proposed airship/treasuremap v2: Add ingress function  https://review.opendev.org/74717920:51
openstackgerritDrew Walters proposed airship/treasuremap v2: Add target/workload phase to CI jobs  https://review.opendev.org/74727320:51
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Testing phases v2  https://review.opendev.org/74802920:59
*** dwalt has quit IRC21:15
openstackgerritAndrew Schiefelbein proposed airship/airshipui master: [WIP] add auth login page and related functionality  https://review.opendev.org/74801721:26
openstackgerritSidney Shiba proposed airship/airshipctl master: Adding Docker Image Push to Quay.io  https://review.opendev.org/74380121:27
openstackgerritRuslan Aliev proposed airship/airshipctl master: Use log module to determine current log level  https://review.opendev.org/74803221:34
openstackgerritRahul Khiyani proposed airship/porthole master: Add apparmor profile for etcd-ondemand containers  https://review.opendev.org/74421922:12
openstackgerritRahul Khiyani proposed airship/porthole master: Add apparmor profile for etcd-ondemand containers  https://review.opendev.org/74421922:12
mattmceuenI think the changeset to add capd support to airshipctl is shaping up well and is ready for more eyes:  https://review.opendev.org/#/c/73787122:12
mattmceuenAs well as local testing - it's capd after all :)22:12
*** sreejithp has quit IRC22:14
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Testing phases v2  https://review.opendev.org/74802922:31
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> @mattmceuen are there any functional tests for capd? i mean to understand that it is actually working?22:32
openstackgerritRuslan Aliev proposed airship/airshipctl master: Refactor airshipctl root command  https://review.opendev.org/74804522:44
openstackgerritRuslan Aliev proposed airship/airshipctl master: Remove debug field from AirshipCTLSettings  https://review.opendev.org/74804823:09
openstackgerritKostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Testing phases v2  https://review.opendev.org/74802923:17
mattmceuen@kk6740 There's a separate patchset for gating, but I haven't seen it succeed yet - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738682/23:32
airship-irc-bot2<kk6740> recheck should help with that, we had an issue with zuul mirriors not being available23:33
mattmceuenhopefully that was the only issue!23:34
*** uzumaki has joined #airshipit23:46
openstackgerritSreejith Punnapuzha proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP] Enhance target node deployment on gates  https://review.opendev.org/73869623:48
openstackgerritMatthew Fuller proposed airship/airshipui master: [WIP] Lazy load phases  https://review.opendev.org/74802023:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!