| *** nishantkr has quit IRC | 00:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jordan Jensen proposed airship/airshipui master: Remove execute permissions for Developers Guide https://review.opendev.org/708284 | 00:58 |
|---|---|---|
| *** dwalt has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ahmad Mahmoudi proposed airship/shipyard master: WIP: (fix) Addressing file not found issue https://review.opendev.org/707709 | 02:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Ahmad Mahmoudi proposed airship/shipyard master: WIP: (fix) Addressing file not found issue https://review.opendev.org/707709 | 03:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/shipyard master: Implement Security Context for Airflow_Worker https://review.opendev.org/692224 | 05:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/shipyard master: Implement Security Context for Airflow_Worker https://review.opendev.org/692224 | 05:21 |
| *** evrardjp has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** evrardjp has joined #airshipit | 05:34 | |
| *** pgaxatte has joined #airshipit | 07:23 | |
| *** dpawlik has joined #airshipit | 07:38 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 08:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: Refactor document Bundle interface https://review.opendev.org/708132 | 08:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: Add filtering methods for document bundle https://review.opendev.org/704123 | 09:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: Add expression based filter for document bundle https://review.opendev.org/705016 | 09:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: Implement document rendering sub-command https://review.opendev.org/698658 | 09:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: Refactor document Bundle interface https://review.opendev.org/708132 | 09:29 |
| *** georgk has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
| *** rihabb2527 has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
| *** georgk has joined #airshipit | 10:35 | |
| *** rihabb2527 has joined #airshipit | 10:35 | |
| *** rihabb2527 has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** georgk has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** rihabb2527 has joined #airshipit | 12:31 | |
| *** georgk has joined #airshipit | 12:31 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/maas master: Enable Docker default AppArmor profile to maas https://review.opendev.org/705136 | 12:41 |
| *** SRao has joined #airshipit | 13:59 | |
| *** nishantkr has joined #airshipit | 14:03 | |
| *** zogger has joined #airshipit | 14:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/maas master: Enable Docker default AppArmor profile to maas https://review.opendev.org/705136 | 14:06 |
| *** dwalt has joined #airshipit | 14:06 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has joined #airshipit | 14:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/maas master: Enable Docker default AppArmor profile to maas https://review.opendev.org/705136 | 14:08 |
| *** ab2434_ has joined #airshipit | 14:36 | |
| *** souradage has joined #airshipit | 14:45 | |
| *** michael-beaver has joined #airshipit | 14:59 | |
| ian-pittwood | #startmeeting | 15:00 |
| openstack | ian-pittwood: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee' | 15:00 |
| ian-pittwood | #startmeeting airship | 15:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Feb 18 15:00:34 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ian-pittwood. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'airship' | 15:00 |
| ian-pittwood | There we go, still learning the ropes. Hello, everyone! | 15:00 |
| ian-pittwood | #topic rollcall | 15:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:01 | |
| mattmceuen | o/ | 15:01 |
| mattmceuen | GM ian-pittwood! | 15:01 |
| ian-pittwood | Here's today's agenda https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2020-02-18 | 15:01 |
| dwalt | o/ | 15:01 |
| *** ashferg has joined #airshipit | 15:02 | |
| aaronsheffield | o/ | 15:02 |
| ian-pittwood | Looks pretty empty minus the review requests so please feel free to add anything for discussion today! | 15:02 |
| michael-beaver | o/ | 15:02 |
| *** ab2434_ has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| ian-pittwood | I'll wait a couple minutes and then we'll start | 15:02 |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 15:02 | |
| souradage | o/ | 15:03 |
| nishantkr | o/ | 15:03 |
| *** LoicL35 has joined #airshipit | 15:03 | |
| alexanderhughes | o/ | 15:03 |
| ian-pittwood | Alright, let's get things started. | 15:04 |
| ian-pittwood | #topic Reminder: core team nominations | 15:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Reminder: core team nominations (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:04 | |
| roman_g | o/ | 15:04 |
| ian-pittwood | Looks like this one is from mattmceuen | 15:04 |
| jamesgu | o/ | 15:04 |
| mattmceuen | Hey, not a big one: | 15:05 |
| mattmceuen | Just an occasional reminder around our core reviewer nomination process | 15:05 |
| *** madhumati has joined #airshipit | 15:05 | |
| mattmceuen | We have a number of different corners of the airship community working on different things -- not exactly 1:1 with projects, but there are definitely different teams doing different things | 15:06 |
| mattmceuen | an important responsibility of the core reviewers on a project to be aware of the status/health of the core reviewer team they're a part of | 15:06 |
| *** siraj_ has joined #airshipit | 15:07 | |
| mattmceuen | if the team doesn't have enough cores -- then please keep your eye out for potential cores and help groom them to readiness | 15:07 |
| mattmceuen | if there's someone qualified and ready -- any member of that project's core team can nominate them on the mailing list | 15:07 |
| *** pramchan has joined #airshipit | 15:08 | |
| ian-pittwood | What are the official rules again on voting for that? Do all the cores specific to that project need to approve or is it a certain percentage of cores? | 15:08 |
| mattmceuen | if a core member has "moved on" and is no longer active in the community -- then there are some friendly conventions around proposing de-core-reviewering | 15:08 |
| mattmceuen | I just double-checked our governance, and don't see anything formal written down (that's what I thought) | 15:09 |
| mattmceuen | the convention is that there's a one-week period after the core nomination goes out (by an existing core) | 15:10 |
| mattmceuen | and then at the end of the week, +1s / -1s are tallied up | 15:10 |
| mattmceuen | the only other thing I have is a reminder of my personal guidelines for core reviewer selection -- two checkboxes in my mind: | 15:11 |
| mattmceuen | 1. a history of meaningful reviews in the project (meaningful meaning of course, textual feedback that's helpful, as opposed to flyby +1s/-1s on the other end) | 15:11 |
| mattmceuen | 2. meaningful, quality, non-trivial contributions to that project. This person will help steer the project, so it's important they have a strong understanding of it! | 15:12 |
| mattmceuen | There's no set number of cores for a team -- active projects benefit from a bit more; mature projects don't necessarily need as many | 15:12 |
| mattmceuen | That's all I had on this - any questions/thoughts? | 15:13 |
| roman_g | stackalitycs provides stats on voting, but lacks stats on comments | 15:13 |
| roman_g | Stas if I'm not mistaken submitted a patch to count comments with +0 vote | 15:14 |
| roman_g | Not yet merged, afaik. | 15:14 |
| roman_g | Or me.. I don't remember ) | 15:14 |
| mattmceuen | Oh that's interesting - hadn't seen that one | 15:14 |
| mattmceuen | :) | 15:14 |
| ian-pittwood | I think the comments are a little too subjective for that kind of tracking, but I'm not opposed to more statistics | 15:14 |
| roman_g | Anyway. Good way to see who is doing reviews at all. | 15:14 |
| ian-pittwood | That's true | 15:14 |
| pramchan | Does this refer to Airship 1.0 , 2.0, metal3.io, Ironic all or some select ones? | 15:15 |
| roman_g | And then filter those who do meaningful reviews | 15:15 |
| mattmceuen | The most important reason for the "current cores" on a project to nominate "new cores" is that they're the team that's already very familiar with someone's work | 15:15 |
| roman_g | pramchan: Airship 1.0, 2.0 | 15:15 |
| pramchan | OK thx | 15:15 |
| mattmceuen | so at that granularity, if you have to look them up in stackalytics, it's probably just to validate your existing gut check | 15:15 |
| roman_g | True. | 15:16 |
| ian-pittwood | Any further questions/comments for mattmceuen? | 15:16 |
| pramchan | Is there any link to Treasuremap 2.0? | 15:16 |
| pramchan | Are all docs submitted there in for 2.0? | 15:16 |
| mattmceuen | https://opendev.org/airship/treasuremap/src/branch/v2 | 15:17 |
| pramchan | Thanks | 15:17 |
| ian-pittwood | Alright we're going to move back into announcements since I see something there now | 15:17 |
| mattmceuen | The goal is to get YAML manifests into the v2 branch of treasuremap (although we're cutting our teeth on the airshipctl project in that area) | 15:17 |
| ian-pittwood | #topic 16GB RAM and 32GB RAM flavors are available for Airship 2.0 initiative (as of now only for jobs in airshipctl repo) | 15:18 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "16GB RAM and 32GB RAM flavors are available for Airship 2.0 initiative (as of now only for jobs in airshipctl repo) (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:18 | |
| mattmceuen | For documentation proper, it should be targeted to the airship/docs project for both 1.0 and 2.0 docs | 15:18 |
| mattmceuen | (as a rule of thumb at least) | 15:18 |
| ian-pittwood | mattmceuen this one is yours | 15:18 |
| roman_g | mine. | 15:18 |
| roman_g | it's just an announcement | 15:18 |
| ian-pittwood | oh my gosh you're the same color on my etherpad | 15:18 |
| ian-pittwood | my bad | 15:18 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://opendev.org/airship/airshipctl/src/branch/master/zuul.d/nodesets.yaml#L18-L44 | 15:19 |
| mattmceuen | hahaha that confused the heck out of me -- was like, it looks like I added it but sure don't remember | 15:19 |
| ian-pittwood | Take it away roman_g | 15:19 |
| roman_g | Well, just an announcement that we can now use this two new flavors and a new nodeset consisting of 1x32GB + 3x16GB RAM VMs. Hardware virtualization is enabled. | 15:20 |
| portdirect | roman_g: are these only for airship jobs atm? | 15:20 |
| mattmceuen | that's awesome | 15:20 |
| roman_g | Kostiantyn Kalynovsky is informed (he is primary user, atm). | 15:20 |
| portdirect | Or projects that ask nicely? | 15:20 |
| roman_g | portdirect: no technical restriction to be used in other projects. But other projects don't really know this flavors exist. | 15:21 |
| roman_g | portdirect: want to utilize for OSH? ;) | 15:21 |
| portdirect | Yes | 15:22 |
| roman_g | portdirect: technically you can. Ericsson agreed to share resources for all projects. | 15:23 |
| mattmceuen | but you set yourself up portdirect, still need to ask nicely :p | 15:23 |
| roman_g | I.e. practically you can, as well. | 15:23 |
| ian-pittwood | Any more discussion on this announcement? | 15:24 |
| roman_g | portdirect: also, running some other jos on this new nodesets would provide with early feedback in case something fails on provider's side | 15:25 |
| ian-pittwood | Alright seems like we're good to move forward. | 15:26 |
| mattmceuen | thanks for working with infra team to get us this, roman_g | 15:26 |
| ian-pittwood | Yeah thank you | 15:26 |
| ian-pittwood | #topic Lots of issues to peruse in https://github.com/airshipit/airshipctl/issues | 15:26 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Lots of issues to peruse in https://github.com/airshipit/airshipctl/issues (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:26 | |
| roman_g | You are most welcome. | 15:26 |
| ian-pittwood | Now back to mattmceuen | 15:26 |
| mattmceuen | oh yeah - this is even quicker | 15:26 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/airshipit/airshipctl/issues | 15:27 |
| mattmceuen | as has been brought up a few times, dwalt, howell, Rodolfo, many other folks have been defining more scope in our github issue backlog | 15:27 |
| mattmceuen | so just wanted to add a reminder so interested folks could take a look | 15:27 |
| mattmceuen | that's all ian-pittwood | 15:27 |
| ian-pittwood | Alright, cool. | 15:28 |
| ian-pittwood | Nothing more on the agenda so let's move on to roundtable | 15:28 |
| ian-pittwood | #topic roundtable | 15:28 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roundtable (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:28 | |
| dwalt | I have an item. With regards to Zuul jobs, do we have a preference for ansible modules or shell commands? | 15:29 |
| ian-pittwood | The one benefit I think with shell commands is that they're generally usable for devs locally too | 15:30 |
| alexanderhughes | Just a quick note about reviews request coming up. Airship development isn’t limited to just airshipctl. There’s plenty of metal3 issues I added to help get Prakash’s team more eyes on their patches | 15:30 |
| dwalt | ian-pitwood: these aren't shell scripts, just in-line shell commands | 15:30 |
| mattmceuen | Good call alexanderhughes, can you please drop a link to that backlog too? Is it metal3 or some airship tracking backlog? | 15:31 |
| dwalt | they are embedded since we are taking the approach that devs should be able to run our playbooks locally | 15:31 |
| ian-pittwood | Do we have a couple examples dwalt? For the less Zuul savvy among us (me) | 15:31 |
| pramchan | so you want me to add those #PRs to tomorrows meeting? | 15:31 |
| dwalt | This particular playbook just publishes the airshipctl image to quay, so it wouldn't be used by developers. I'm mostly speaking about the most general case | 15:31 |
| mattmceuen | One thing to factor in is, a lot of the ansible playbooks themselves are being designed for use on a dev machine, I believe, right? | 15:32 |
| roman_g | dwalt: as long as we use it only for zuul - it doesn't matter. Once we try to reuse those playbooks for deployment & management (e.g. Ansible Tower or alternatives), then it makes sense to use native modules, as it usually provides with better idempotency. | 15:32 |
| alexanderhughes | pramchan: they’re in today’s agenda. We can also discuss tomorrow if needed. In mean time can you link the backlog you’re working out of? Is it from old JIRA board or in github issues etc | 15:32 |
| pramchan | OK like https://github.com/metal3-io/metal3-docs/pull/60 | 15:32 |
| roman_g | dwalt: in your particular pathc set - it's fine to use shell commands. | 15:32 |
| roman_g | *patch set | 15:33 |
| ian-pittwood | pramchan: I'll link all the review requests after this | 15:33 |
| dwalt | portdirect: was your comment in reference to all playbooks, or just within the playbook I wrote? | 15:33 |
| pramchan | I need some education on Jira to github transition, is it what Airship Blog shows or any other link I can use to undertsnad that? | 15:34 |
| portdirect | dwalt: just that one, as I've not looked extensively through others | 15:35 |
| portdirect | But in general it's best to stick to one approach or the other | 15:35 |
| mattmceuen | for airshipctl in particular -- since it's already a straightforward CLI, I wonder if adding wrapper shell scripts would be overkill? | 15:35 |
| *** madhumati has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| portdirect | No | 15:36 |
| mattmceuen | testing often goes in the shell scripts; that's valuable stuff we want to retain on one place or another | 15:36 |
| portdirect | As it makes it much easier to consume outside of the playbook | 15:36 |
| *** pgaxatte has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
| ian-pittwood | pramchan: most of the projects are just switching to GitHub Issues. for airshipctl the link is https://github.com/airshipit/airshipctl/issues | 15:36 |
| ian-pittwood | most issues that looked active should be ported over already | 15:37 |
| roman_g | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707478/ patch set in question, shell vs. ansible native module | 15:37 |
| mattmceuen | pramchan: here's an intro guide to github issues in general: https://guides.github.com/features/issues/ | 15:37 |
| alexanderhughes | pramchan: we can discuss more at flight plan tomorrow, but for now all that’s been migrated is airshipctl linked in the blog. If there’s items getting worked out of JIRA still we need to discuss tomorrow and make sure they get migrated as well as story requirements may have changed. | 15:37 |
| pramchan | So do I need to add all Jira issues which I deal in to trasfer to link above? | 15:38 |
| ian-pittwood | Personally, I'm fine with working through what's left in Jira and just not making any new issues in there | 15:39 |
| pramchan | OK thaks appreciate that | 15:39 |
| ian-pittwood | But I think it's something to bring up in flight plan as alexanderhughes said | 15:39 |
| mattmceuen | ok I think we got off track | 15:39 |
| mattmceuen | back to scripts vs ansibles: | 15:39 |
| dwalt | Sorry, stepped away for a second. I can translate to the shell wrapper if that's appropriate for image publishing. This seems like a specialized procedure that we don't want devs to run, though | 15:39 |
| dwalt | Another approach: it looks like the airship-images repo job has merged. We could genericize that and use it in airshipctl | 15:40 |
| mattmceuen | I guess first thing, yeah Pete just to make sure I understand the context: are you thinking in terms of e.g. tagging images for downstream build/consume? | 15:40 |
| mattmceuen | portdirect^ | 15:40 |
| pramchan | Does Script iclude golang too or you just refer to shell? | 15:40 |
| mattmceuen | just shell vs ansible | 15:40 |
| portdirect | Oh man, you guys hate on the guy in a car ;) | 15:40 |
| pramchan | ok | 15:40 |
| mattmceuen | lol | 15:40 |
| portdirect | But yes | 15:41 |
| mattmceuen | that makes sense | 15:41 |
| portdirect | We are installing multiple packages | 15:41 |
| *** souradage has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| portdirect | Just to write out a tiny config file | 15:41 |
| portdirect | Either template it | 15:41 |
| portdirect | Or use docker cli to generate it | 15:41 |
| portdirect | Or if you want to use docker module | 15:41 |
| portdirect | Use that everywhere | 15:41 |
| portdirect | Either is fine, its just a mix atm that gives us the worst of both worlds | 15:42 |
| roman_g | which config file? | 15:42 |
| portdirect | Docker auth file | 15:42 |
| roman_g | ah | 15:42 |
| portdirect | Make sense? | 15:43 |
| roman_g | kinda. yes. for me. | 15:43 |
| dwalt | Yep. Thanks for the explanation portdirect | 15:44 |
| roman_g | Thanks. | 15:44 |
| mattmceuen | sounds good to me | 15:44 |
| ian-pittwood | Alright, anything else for roundtable? | 15:44 |
| dwalt | Unless anyone is strongly opposed, Ill give the docker module a try for this specialized job | 15:44 |
| ian-pittwood | +1 | 15:44 |
| roman_g | +1 to this | 15:44 |
| ian-pittwood | #topic reviews | 15:45 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "reviews (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:45 | |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/690870 | 15:45 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/digambar15/metal3-docs/commit/023b6eb772d20162bf0712e6debd27dcf92325fb | 15:45 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/metal3-docs/pull/64 | 15:45 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/metal3-docs/pull/60 | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/metal3-docs/pull/63 | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/metal3-docs/pull/66 | 15:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Sirajudeen proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#22-WIP] - use table test for set context tests https://review.opendev.org/707768 | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pull/407 | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/issues/351 | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | #link https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pull/292 | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | Alright I believe that's the list | 15:46 |
| ian-pittwood | There's further details in the agenda for each of these links | 15:47 |
| ian-pittwood | Does anyone have any other review requests or any last minute topics? | 15:47 |
| ian-pittwood | Ok, well with that I think we're all done here. Thanks for your time, everyone! | 15:49 |
| ian-pittwood | #endmeeting | 15:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "https://opendev.org/airship || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Airship || https://review.opendev.org/#/q/projects:airship+status:open+NOT+label:Verified%253D-1+NOT+label:Workflow%253D-1+NOT+message:DNM+NOT+message:WIP" | 15:49 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Feb 18 15:49:27 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:49 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2020/airship.2020-02-18-15.00.html | 15:49 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2020/airship.2020-02-18-15.00.txt | 15:49 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2020/airship.2020-02-18-15.00.log.html | 15:49 |
| alexanderhughes | Thanks all | 15:49 |
| dwalt | Thanks! | 15:49 |
| roman_g | Thanks to everyone. | 15:51 |
| *** SRao has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
| *** LoicL35 has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sirajudeen proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#22] - using table driven test https://review.opendev.org/708438 | 16:18 |
| openstackgerrit | Sirajudeen proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#22] - use table test for set context tests https://review.opendev.org/707768 | 16:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Andrew Schiefelbein proposed airship/airshipui master: [14] this adds in all command line options from octant. https://review.opendev.org/707714 | 16:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/airshipctl master: Use RemoveAll to cleanup test directories https://review.opendev.org/708268 | 16:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Sirajudeen proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#22] - use table driven test for set auth https://review.opendev.org/708438 | 17:01 |
| *** pramchan has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dan Crank proposed airship/divingbell master: [ad-hoc] Fix test case exit conditions https://review.opendev.org/703880 | 17:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: WIP [#50] Cleanup temp files from unit tests https://review.opendev.org/708251 | 17:24 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: WIP [#50] Cleanup temp files from unit tests https://review.opendev.org/708251 | 17:32 |
| *** evrardjp has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
| *** evrardjp has joined #airshipit | 17:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#50] Clean up temp files from unit tests https://review.opendev.org/708251 | 17:58 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/promenade master: Add Docker default AppArmor profile to promenade https://review.opendev.org/704346 | 18:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/promenade master: [proxy] robustness tweak for liveness probe https://review.opendev.org/700825 | 18:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#51] Set context unless current-context is false https://review.opendev.org/708479 | 18:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#51] Set context when no flags are provided https://review.opendev.org/708479 | 18:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/airshipctl master: [#41] Update `make godoc` target https://review.opendev.org/707431 | 18:32 |
| dwalt | howell: Just saw your comments on airshipctl #51. The change above is a band-aid fix for now if there's value to putting it in. I'll start working on switching the --current-context flag to --use-context | 18:35 |
| howell | dwalt: ah, my comment may have been a bit unclear. By use-context, I meant a whole new subcommand as opposed to a new flag | 18:36 |
| howell | is #51 ready for review? | 18:37 |
| dwalt | Yeah, #51 is ready for reviews | 18:39 |
| dwalt | I see what you mean. I'll start looking into that today | 18:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#42] Refactor flag operations to be uniform https://review.opendev.org/706630 | 18:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#51] Remove current-context flag https://review.opendev.org/708479 | 19:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/airshipctl master: [#6] Add config init subcommand https://review.opendev.org/707252 | 19:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Andrew Schiefelbein proposed airship/airshipui master: [14] this adds in all command line options from octant. https://review.opendev.org/707714 | 19:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Ahmad Mahmoudi proposed airship/shipyard master: WIP: (fix) Addressing file not found issue https://review.opendev.org/707709 | 19:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/airshipctl master: Add render sub-command frame https://review.opendev.org/697327 | 19:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Dan Crank proposed airship/divingbell master: [ad-hoc] Fix test case exit conditions https://review.opendev.org/703880 | 19:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Kostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/images master: [WIP] Enabling post job to push images https://review.opendev.org/708503 | 20:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#50] Clean up temp files from unit tests https://review.opendev.org/708251 | 20:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: [#42] Refactor flag operations to be uniform https://review.opendev.org/706630 | 20:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Dan Crank proposed airship/divingbell master: [ad-hoc] Fix test case exit conditions https://review.opendev.org/703880 | 20:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Ahmad Mahmoudi proposed airship/shipyard master: WIP: (fix) Addressing file not found issue https://review.opendev.org/707709 | 20:44 |
| *** michael-beaver has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ahmad Mahmoudi proposed airship/shipyard master: WIP: (fix) Addressing file not found issue https://review.opendev.org/707709 | 21:10 |
| *** high-rez has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Stas Egorov proposed airship/airshipctl master: [WIP]: new CLI for getting module config https://review.opendev.org/707284 | 21:52 |
| *** aaronsheffield has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/shipyard master: [WIP] Implement Security Context for Airflow_Worker https://review.opendev.org/692224 | 22:08 |
| *** timClicks has joined #airshipit | 22:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jordan Jensen proposed airship/airshipui master: [14] Add command line options from octant https://review.opendev.org/707714 | 22:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/shipyard master: [WIP] Implement Security Context for Airflow_Worker https://review.opendev.org/692224 | 22:45 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/airshipui master: [14] Add command line options from octant https://review.opendev.org/707714 | 23:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/divingbell master: Add Docker default AppArmor profile to divingbell https://review.opendev.org/705469 | 23:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Phil Sphicas proposed airship/promenade master: etcd chart: anchor pre_stop remove bashism https://review.opendev.org/708533 | 23:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Jordan Kramer proposed airship/armada master: [WIP] Added Password Rotation Gate https://review.opendev.org/708538 | 23:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Kostyantyn Kalynovskyi proposed airship/airshipctl master: Change document labeling https://review.opendev.org/708539 | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!