| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 00:18 |
| *** aagate has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 00:21 |
| jayahn | mark-burnett: "Every Thursday, alternating between 10 AM EST, vs 4 PM EST", which one is for this week? 10AM? 4PM? | 00:26 |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 01:25 |
| *** felipemonteiro has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
| *** felipemonteiro has joined #airshipit | 01:54 | |
| *** felipemonteiro has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 02:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 02:42 |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
| *** felipemonteiro has joined #airshipit | 02:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-drydock master: Back-off pyghmi upgrade https://review.openstack.org/603186 | 03:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 03:11 |
| *** felipemonteiro has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Testing drydock pyghmi fix https://review.openstack.org/603274 | 03:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 03:44 |
| *** felipemonteiro has joined #airshipit | 03:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 03:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 03:48 |
| *** felipemonteiro has quit IRC | 03:52 | |
| *** felipemonteiro has joined #airshipit | 03:56 | |
| *** felipemonteiro has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 04:10 |
| *** cfriesen has quit IRC | 04:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 04:32 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Testing drydock pyghmi fix https://review.openstack.org/603274 | 04:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 05:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Testing drydock pyghmi fix https://review.openstack.org/603274 | 05:07 |
| openstackgerrit | Craig Anderson proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: fix divingbell gate scripts https://review.openstack.org/603246 | 05:46 |
| ethfci | roman_f: ubuntu@n0:~$ nslookup att.com | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Server:192.168.77.1 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Address:192.168.77.1#53 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Non-authoritative answer: | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Name:att.com | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Address: 144.160.36.42 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Name:att.com | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Address: 144.160.155.43 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | ubuntu@n0:~$ nslookup google.com | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Server:192.168.77.1 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Address:192.168.77.1#53 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Non-authoritative answer: | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Name:google.com | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Address: 172.217.21.174 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | ubuntu@n0:~$ nslookup att.com | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Server:192.168.77.1 | 05:59 |
| ethfci | Address:192.168.77.1#53 | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Non-authoritative answer: | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Name:att.com | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Address: 144.160.36.42 | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Name:att.com | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Address: 144.160.155.43 | 06:00 |
| ethfci | ubuntu@n0:~$ nslookup google.com | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Server:192.168.77.1 | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Address:192.168.77.1#53 | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Non-authoritative answer: | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Name:google.com | 06:00 |
| ethfci | Address: 172.217.21.174 | 06:00 |
| ethfci | the setup is libvirt based ith has dnsmasq | 06:00 |
| ethfci | roman_g it seems to me i should stop using libvirt-dnsmasq, thanks for the hint | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ubuntu@n0:~$ dig +time=2 +tries=1 att.com @153.88.112.200 | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> +time=2 +tries=1 att.com @153.88.112.200 | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; global options: +cmd | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; Got answer: | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2461 | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4000 | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; QUESTION SECTION: | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;att.com.INA | 06:15 |
| ethfci | ;; ANSWER SECTION: | 06:15 |
| ethfci | att.com.300INA144.160.36.42 | 06:16 |
| ethfci | att.com.300INA144.160.155.43 | 06:16 |
| ethfci | ;; Query time: 182 msec | 06:16 |
| ethfci | ;; SERVER: 153.88.112.200#53(153.88.112.200) | 06:16 |
| ethfci | ;; WHEN: Tue Sep 18 08:09:50 CEST 2018 | 06:16 |
| ethfci | ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 68 | 06:16 |
| *** georgk has joined #airshipit | 07:53 | |
| openstackgerrit | Smruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [WIP] Delivery of default seccomp Profile on each Host on site deployment https://review.openstack.org/602532 | 08:04 |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 10:37 | |
| *** mardim has quit IRC | 10:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Smruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed openstack/airship-drydock master: Update node-labels through Kubernetes Provisioner https://review.openstack.org/593609 | 11:00 |
| *** mardim has joined #airshipit | 11:03 | |
| roman_g | mark-burnett: Hi Mark. Is Airship meeting still on Tuesdays? | 11:11 |
| roman_g | Haven't found logs for lats 2 meetings in September https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-team-meeting-agenda | 11:12 |
| roman_g | *last | 11:12 |
| openstackgerrit | Smruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed openstack/airship-drydock master: Update node-labels through Kubernetes Provisioner https://review.openstack.org/593609 | 13:23 |
| mark-burnett | @roman_g meetings are still on Tuesdays. I'm not sure where the 9/11 meeting notes are, but there was no 9/18 meeting, because of the PTG. | 13:24 |
| mark-burnett | Woops, off by a week sorry - there was no 9/11 meeting because of the PTG | 13:27 |
| *** sthussey has joined #airshipit | 13:36 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has joined #airshipit | 13:38 | |
| evrardjp | mark-burnett: :) | 13:45 |
| mark-burnett | :) | 13:46 |
| *** sgrasley has joined #airshipit | 13:47 | |
| roman_g | mark-burnett: thanks | 13:48 |
| roman_g | good morning | 13:48 |
| mark-burnett | morning, i updated the list too for more clarity | 13:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Roman Gorshunov proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: New option --out-file, fixes for retries logic https://review.openstack.org/603395 | 13:56 |
| sthussey | here | 14:00 |
| mark-burnett | #startmeeting airship | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Sep 18 14:00:21 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mark-burnett. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| portdirect | o/ | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'airship' | 14:00 |
| mark-burnett | Hi all, thanks for coming | 14:00 |
| aaronsheffield | o/ | 14:00 |
| roman_g | o/ | 14:00 |
| mark-burnett | Here's our agenda for the meeting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2018-09-18 | 14:00 |
| mattmceuen | o/ | 14:00 |
| mark-burnett | Please feel free to add items | 14:01 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Meeting reschedule | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Meeting reschedule (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:02 | |
| mark-burnett | We've talked about this for quite a long time, and it seems that there's no traction for moving it | 14:02 |
| mark-burnett | Everyone who voted in the doodle selected the current time | 14:03 |
| mark-burnett | We didn't really get much participation from people who don't already attend | 14:03 |
| mark-burnett | I think we should simply table this until it comes up again organically. Any other thoughts? | 14:03 |
| seaneagan | o/ | 14:03 |
| roman_g | I'm OK with this time and frequency. | 14:03 |
| mattmceuen | Sounds reasonable to me | 14:04 |
| roman_g | Yes, table it. | 14:04 |
| sthussey | I believe the genesis for the request was the edge cloud | 14:04 |
| sthussey | So maybe in the meantime, if there is a contact there the doodle could be provided such that those interested in attending both could vote | 14:04 |
| mark-burnett | Yeah, that was a big motivator | 14:05 |
| mattmceuen | Maybe let's connect with Chris H on this | 14:05 |
| mark-burnett | @hogepodge ^ | 14:05 |
| mattmceuen | Let him make sure it gets in front of "the right people" | 14:06 |
| mattmceuen | Oh look there he is ;-) | 14:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: Ensure Drydock pod logs are fetched in case of any exceptions https://review.openstack.org/603398 | 14:06 |
| mark-burnett | Let's leave it at that for now then | 14:06 |
| mark-burnett | #action mark-burnett work with hogepodge reach out to others who didn't participate in discussion about rescheduling | 14:07 |
| mark-burnett | #topic PTG | 14:07 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "PTG (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:07 | |
| mark-burnett | We had pretty great attendance in our room at the PTG! | 14:07 |
| mark-burnett | Thanks everyone for contributing | 14:07 |
| mark-burnett | I listed some of the interested attendees in the etherpad, but there were also some really great questions and thoughts from other folks too | 14:08 |
| roman_g | How many people? | 14:08 |
| mark-burnett | Well, Monday morning, there was not enough room at the tables really. I guess that was roughly 20 people? | 14:08 |
| mark-burnett | I should have counted -- 2 or 3 people were literally sitting on the floor until we got more chairs | 14:08 |
| mattmceuen | Here's the etherpad, where some notes were captured if anyone wants to catch up: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AirshipPTG4 | 14:09 |
| mark-burnett | Thanks mattmceuen | 14:09 |
| mark-burnett | I'll write up a digest email and send it to the list this week | 14:09 |
| mark-burnett | #action mark-burnett write digest of PTG notes for the mailing list | 14:09 |
| hogepodge | hi | 14:09 |
| mark-burnett | Hey Chris | 14:10 |
| mark-burnett | Does anyone have any other thoughts about how the PTG went? | 14:11 |
| portdirect | I thoughr it was pretty good | 14:11 |
| * roman_g wants to participate. | 14:11 | |
| portdirect | there was a lot of interest, esp in a 'stepped' airship | 14:11 |
| hogepodge | I don't know of anyone who wanted a different time. I'll check with ildiko but aside from waking up early here ;-) it should be fine | 14:12 |
| portdirect | as many orgs found the full stack a bit much, eg they have a bm/k8s provisioner | 14:12 |
| portdirect | or are simply looking to get there toes wet | 14:12 |
| roman_g | portdirect, you mean that many of them want to use only specific parts of airship-*? | 14:12 |
| sthussey | seems like Armada would be a good fit for them then | 14:12 |
| portdirect | time will tell how much interest turns into contributions, but theres def great potential | 14:13 |
| mattmceuen | Agree, that was the biggest "surprise" use case for me - there were other use cases / enhancements we knew would be useful that other folks were in large agreement in too, and it was really good fleshing those out a bit with potential users/contributors | 14:13 |
| portdirect | sthussey: armada, into dechand, and also shipyard | 14:13 |
| portdirect | and at that stage... | 14:13 |
| portdirect | why not eat the whole cake ;) | 14:13 |
| mark-burnett | Indeed, there are teams that dont' control hardware provisioning who want to leverage as much of the declarative approach as they can | 14:14 |
| mark-burnett | for example | 14:14 |
| portdirect | there was also a strong desire to make things pluggable, eg kubeadm instead of (or driven by) promenade | 14:14 |
| portdirect | and ironic as a back end for maas | 14:15 |
| sthussey | Drydock is pluggable | 14:15 |
| sthussey | If someone wants Ironic, the design supports them adding it | 14:15 |
| portdirect | yeah 0 though someone needs to step up and write the plug ;) | 14:15 |
| mattmceuen | Yup, we discussed that and there was a lot of support for it | 14:15 |
| sthussey | It seems kubeadm would mostly be a alternative to promenade | 14:15 |
| portdirect | there was also some discussion later in the week on the use of yaml for deckhand | 14:16 |
| portdirect | where a few people expressed an interest in json responses | 14:16 |
| portdirect | though fmonetro has a better understanding of the discussion there. | 14:16 |
| sthussey | Sounds like there is a lot of room for some speculative designs | 14:17 |
| sthussey | Will be great to see specs written up by those interested in these enhancements | 14:17 |
| portdirect | ++ | 14:17 |
| jayahn | o/ | 14:17 |
| mark-burnett | Hi jay :) | 14:17 |
| jayahn | hi | 14:18 |
| portdirect | on the subject of `stepped` airship - I think mattmceuen 's work on airskiff has great potential there. | 14:18 |
| jamesgu__ | ++ | 14:18 |
| portdirect | as it's already 90% of what people were expressing an interest in. | 14:18 |
| portdirect | in addtion to the full stack. | 14:19 |
| sthussey | There you go | 14:19 |
| jamesgu__ | airskiff is a step up itself to just using the Armada | 14:20 |
| mattmceuen | Thanks portdirect - I think that's a good POC of the concept, and I think some additional things would need to be done to make the concept work well in a real life deployment | 14:20 |
| mattmceuen | E.g. there was discussion around leveraging drydock to potentially manage machines that were brought in a "bring your own OS" type scenario | 14:20 |
| mattmceuen | But we can evolve to those | 14:21 |
| jamesgu__ | or possible to bring in promenade in the bring your own hardware? | 14:21 |
| mark-burnett | I think airskiff is basically just running helm install on the airship charts on an existing kube cluster | 14:22 |
| sthussey | I think most of this needs to be put together in a cohesive spec | 14:23 |
| mark-burnett | I think if we're going to implement a tiered approach, the components will need to be armada-managed | 14:23 |
| mattmceuen | Yup, that's it. In an eventual, target-state BYO{x} it would be nice to use an armada-based deployment | 14:23 |
| sthussey | Ad hoc IRC discussion probably omits too many details to be valuable | 14:24 |
| mark-burnett | Yeah, a spec would be useful here so that intent is really clear | 14:24 |
| mark-burnett | What is in bounds and what is out | 14:24 |
| mattmceuen | Sounds like good discussion for Rodolfo's weekly design call as well | 14:24 |
| mattmceuen | To figure out what should go into the spec | 14:25 |
| jayahn | speaking of design call, why it is so~~ difficult to find out this week's design meeting time. I found etherpad, I found design meeting is switching time, but not the exact information on this week's time. it should be really easy information to find. | 14:25 |
| mark-burnett | Good point Jay, let me add it to the main etherpad for reference: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-team-meeting-agenda | 14:25 |
| mark-burnett | I'll put that in there today | 14:25 |
| mark-burnett | #action mark-burnett make sure the design call details are in this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-team-meeting-agenda | 14:25 |
| mark-burnett | On another note, there was some discussion in the infra team about how to facilitate screen sharing/phone calls while still achieving good accessibility | 14:26 |
| jayahn | I don't want to move a topic away.. but, it should be really easy information to find like other openstack-meeting information. | 14:26 |
| mark-burnett | As mattmceuen said, we need to make sure that the important parts of design conversations are captured in specs | 14:27 |
| mattmceuen | Agree jayahn, any suggestions? | 14:27 |
| jamesgu__ | before we move on to next topic, with the discussion of a spec, sounds like the plan is to move Airskiff to Openstack proper? | 14:27 |
| mattmceuen | on where we could put the info | 14:27 |
| mattmceuen | Let me clarify | 14:27 |
| mark-burnett | @jamesgu__ I think we need to figure out a plan before we do that | 14:27 |
| mark-burnett | It's not clear there needs to be a new component here | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | re: airskiff - because it got some good attention at the PTG (#flattering) | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | Airskiff was intented first and foremost to be a dev environment | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | We discussed at the PTG using "airskiff approach" for two additional things | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | gating | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | byo{X} | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | I think those are great use cases, and I don't want to shoehorn anything so important into my github repo :) | 14:29 |
| mattmceuen | So to your question | 14:29 |
| roman_g | jamesgu__: as usual, all OpenStack projects meetings are described here, including Airship: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Airship_Team_Meeting . Please, check it out. | 14:29 |
| mattmceuen | I will be working w/ Drew this week to adjust his PS for additional gates per our discussion @ the PTG | 14:29 |
| mattmceuen | I want to use the airskiff approach (which is really the openstack-helm approach that I borrowed) for some very lightweight gates | 14:29 |
| mattmceuen | That will start out as nonvoting | 14:29 |
| mattmceuen | And use the treasuremap manifests as much as possible | 14:30 |
| mark-burnett | This probably belongs in the design call, but it seems to me that we could make a small change to armada and simply use that directly | 14:30 |
| sthussey | I believe there is a meeting topic on testing methods | 14:30 |
| mattmceuen | So that work will move into treasuremap proper as a new home, but if it makes sense I'll still keep airskiff around as a separate dev playground | 14:30 |
| mark-burnett | Let's move on to new business | 14:31 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Policy for idle patchsets | 14:31 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Policy for idle patchsets (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:31 | |
| mark-burnett | I don't have the links off hand, but there are a couple of older changes that are unlikely to merge and should probably be abandoned | 14:32 |
| mark-burnett | We probably need a simple way of determining whether/when to abandon submitted changes | 14:32 |
| mark-burnett | Suggestions? | 14:33 |
| sthussey | I think 60 days of inactivity should be abandoned | 14:33 |
| roman_g | Bot, adding comments to the change if it's stale for 4 weeks, and abandoning if no replies after 8 weeks. | 14:33 |
| mark-burnett | Those sound really similar and fair to me | 14:34 |
| roman_g | But does it hurt to have patch sets which are abandoned? | 14:35 |
| mark-burnett | Should we try a manual version of what roman suggests and see how it goes? Certainly people can recreate abandoned changes later if that is useful. | 14:35 |
| roman_g | I mean, if author does not care to ask for reviews, then why would we care? | 14:35 |
| roman_g | gerrit will not break | 14:36 |
| evrardjp | mark-burnett: 365 days | 14:36 |
| mattmceuen | You can also un-abandon PS | 14:36 |
| evrardjp | yup | 14:36 |
| mark-burnett | @evrardjp why do you propose that timeline specifically? | 14:36 |
| evrardjp | habit :) | 14:37 |
| mattmceuen | lol | 14:37 |
| mark-burnett | ha, gotcha | 14:37 |
| evrardjp | easy to check | 14:37 |
| sthussey | I'd prefer to be a bit more agressive | 14:37 |
| sthussey | As the cores, though it is not apparent, do try to keep the open PS list down | 14:37 |
| roman_g | Gerrit auto-abandon changes which are stale for certain period of time: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-change-cleanup.html | 14:37 |
| evrardjp | by default it's to 0 | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | iirc | 14:38 |
| sthussey | That looks to be an optional configuration. | 14:38 |
| sthussey | Maybe this is something that Airship projects could tune in openstack-infra | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | it's probably something we can ask infra | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | hahah | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | yeah | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | maybe | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | not sure if it's global or not | 14:38 |
| mark-burnett | yeah, not clear | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | if it's per gerrit instance it will not happen | 14:39 |
| evrardjp | and it kinda looks like it: etc/gerrit.config :) | 14:39 |
| mark-burnett | Well, let's vote on a manual policy and see what happens about automation later | 14:39 |
| evrardjp | I guess it's worth asking on infra to document the manual policy decision | 14:39 |
| evrardjp | should someone ask again | 14:39 |
| mark-burnett | #startvote How long should we leave changes inactive before abandoning? Options: 1M, 2M, 1Y, Never Abandon. | 14:40 |
| openstack | Begin voting on: How long should we leave changes inactive before abandoning? Valid vote options are Options, 1M, 2M, 1Y, Never, Abandon, . | 14:40 |
| openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 14:40 |
| roman_g | Actually, documentation says that patch sets should auto-abandon in 2 weeks of no-touch https://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/gerrit.html#auto-review-expiry | 14:40 |
| mattmceuen | wow, two weeks | 14:41 |
| mark-burnett | Is that just one specific project? | 14:41 |
| roman_g | #vote 2M | 14:41 |
| mattmceuen | that's harsh for contributors that may not be e.g. full-time on the project, in my opinion | 14:41 |
| evrardjp | not sure if it still applies. | 14:41 |
| mark-burnett | #vote 2M | 14:41 |
| portdirect | #vote 2M | 14:41 |
| mattmceuen | #vote 2M | 14:41 |
| aaronsheffield | #vote 1M | 14:41 |
| jayahn | #vote 2M | 14:42 |
| jamesgu__ | #vote 2M | 14:42 |
| evrardjp | I guess the winner is clear :) | 14:42 |
| mark-burnett | It seems, but let's give it another minute in case someone has a strong objection | 14:42 |
| sthussey | #vote 2M | 14:43 |
| mark-burnett | Ok, ending in a efw seconds | 14:43 |
| mark-burnett | #endvote | 14:44 |
| openstack | Voted on "How long should we leave changes inactive before abandoning?" Results are | 14:44 |
| openstack | 2M (7): mark-burnett, portdirect, jayahn, roman_g, mattmceuen, jamesgu__, sthussey | 14:44 |
| openstack | 1M (1): aaronsheffield | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: wip: plugins: Add Armada subdag/operator for helm tests https://review.openstack.org/603236 | 14:44 |
| mark-burnett | Ok, so let's start enforcing a manual policy of giving change authors notice of the policy after ~1M and then abandoning old changes at 2M | 14:44 |
| mark-burnett | #agreed We will abandon changes that have been idle for 2 months, and give authors notice of this policy at approximately 1 month of idle time. | 14:45 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Testing Policy Reminder | 14:45 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Testing Policy Reminder (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:45 | |
| mark-burnett | Quick note on testing changes - in particular for promenade and drydock, which touch a lot of pieces | 14:46 |
| mark-burnett | Please be sure to run the prom resiliency gate for promenade changes. We have not been able to get this going in Zuul yet (or in AT&T-provided 3rd party gating), but it's pretty easy to run locally (if you have about 12G of ram). | 14:46 |
| mark-burnett | It takes about 30 minutes to run on my laptop, for reference | 14:47 |
| mark-burnett | For drydock, the situation is a bit trickier, but there is a similar test (the multi-node gate in airship-in-a-bottle). | 14:47 |
| mark-burnett | Feel free to reach out for help with these, or even better start trying to get them working in zuul :D | 14:47 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Collaboration Opportunities | 14:48 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Collaboration Opportunities (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:48 | |
| mark-burnett | I was super excited to talk to Jay and James at the PTG about working on airship :) | 14:49 |
| mark-burnett | I don't have anything to add beyond the brief snippets in the etherpad | 14:49 |
| jayahn | yeap. just want to do quick intro on this week's design call, and figure from there | 14:49 |
| mark-burnett | Awesome, I'll make sure those details are added | 14:49 |
| mark-burnett | to the etherpad, as above | 14:49 |
| jayahn | thanks | 14:50 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Development Update | 14:50 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Development Update (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:50 | |
| mark-burnett | Just a reminder to add notable development activities to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-dev-update-2018-10-05 so that I can write something up for the list | 14:51 |
| mark-burnett | I'm targeting 10/5 this go around | 14:51 |
| roman_g | would versions.yaml updater fit there? | 14:51 |
| mark-burnett | Yes! | 14:51 |
| mark-burnett | Good though :) | 14:51 |
| mark-burnett | t | 14:51 |
| mattmceuen | ++ | 14:51 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Reviews | 14:52 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Reviews (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:52 | |
| mark-burnett | I don't really have anything to say on this one | 14:52 |
| mark-burnett | Others may have? | 14:52 |
| * mattmceuen is still clueless after long weekend | 14:53 | |
| mark-burnett | Ok, let's punt. If it's an issue we can add it for next week. | 14:54 |
| mark-burnett | #topic reviewbot noise | 14:54 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "reviewbot noise (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:54 | |
| mark-burnett | I think @roman_g raised the idea that every `git review` leading to an irc message is a bit spammy | 14:54 |
| roman_g | Yes, I have raised it. | 14:55 |
| roman_g | I (roman_g) look for questions from community members, and ask for reviews, and ask for help from developers. I don't look at openstackgerrit bot notifications - they only show to me that someone is working. | 14:55 |
| mark-burnett | I personally agree with the opinion of keeping a single irc channel for now, so I'm not too excited about splitting even for a build-notification channel | 14:55 |
| mark-burnett | I don't really use the notifications, as I just look through the gerrit list directly | 14:55 |
| roman_g | Do I go and checkout everyone's review once I see notification from the bot? - No. | 14:56 |
| roman_g | For me it's useless. So far. | 14:56 |
| mark-burnett | I've seen this pattern be useful to some members on smaller teams, but I agree with you overall roman_g . | 14:56 |
| mark-burnett | I would start a vote, but I think most people have gone | 14:57 |
| mark-burnett | I think an hour is too long for us :/ | 14:57 |
| b-str | If there were a way to do a digest, that might be nice | 14:57 |
| roman_g | May be notification on merges would be better. | 14:57 |
| mark-burnett | @b-str interesting idea | 14:57 |
| mark-burnett | @roman_g maybe so, yes, but that's not a call to action for devs | 14:58 |
| mark-burnett | usually | 14:58 |
| mark-burnett | Let's add it to next week for a vote | 14:58 |
| mark-burnett | I don't think we should vote with 2 minutes left and waning attendence | 14:58 |
| mark-burnett | #topic Marketing Deadlines | 14:58 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Marketing Deadlines (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:58 | |
| mark-burnett | Looks like October 1 is the deadline for single page marketing doc and updated website content | 14:59 |
| mark-burnett | I think there's a google doc for the 1 page, but I don't have it handy | 14:59 |
| hogepodge | yes, our design team needs lead time to produce everything for Berlin | 14:59 |
| mark-burnett | Right | 14:59 |
| mark-burnett | What is the best way to give feedback for the website? | 15:00 |
| mark-burnett | We can link the google doc for the 1-pager | 15:00 |
| hogepodge | I've been flowing in a lot of content for the one pager, and will have that and some preliminary website content ready for our meeting on Thursday | 15:00 |
| mark-burnett | ok cool | 15:00 |
| mark-burnett | Thanks hogepodge | 15:00 |
| mark-burnett | alright, let's wrap up | 15:00 |
| mark-burnett | #topic roundtable | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roundtable (Meeting topic: airship)" | 15:00 | |
| mark-burnett | Any last minute thoughts? | 15:00 |
| portdirect | did we have time to discuss -2 reviews? | 15:01 |
| hogepodge | Yeah, we'll need major feedback from you starting Thursday, due by the end of the month (plus revised diagram drafts) | 15:01 |
| mark-burnett | We already hit that topic @portdirect | 15:01 |
| portdirect | must have missed it - damn i created it as well! | 15:01 |
| portdirect | lol | 15:01 |
| mark-burnett | :) | 15:01 |
| mark-burnett | We can add it for next week if you like | 15:01 |
| portdirect | yes please | 15:02 |
| portdirect | thx | 15:02 |
| mark-burnett | ok, let's close | 15:02 |
| mark-burnett | #endmeeting | 15:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "airshipit.org || General Review Dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:%255Eopenstack/airship.*+status:open,n,z" | 15:02 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Sep 18 15:02:18 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:02 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2018/airship.2018-09-18-14.00.html | 15:02 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2018/airship.2018-09-18-14.00.txt | 15:02 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2018/airship.2018-09-18-14.00.log.html | 15:02 |
| roman_g | Thanks everyone. | 15:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-in-a-bottle master: Fixed permission issue to run as non-root https://review.openstack.org/602785 | 15:09 |
| hogepodge | reminder, forum session submissions are open now | 15:12 |
| hogepodge | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum | 15:13 |
| *** felipemonteiro has joined #airshipit | 15:24 | |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 15:38 | |
| *** felipemonteiro has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| *** jamesgu__ has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| openstackgerrit | Aaron Sheffield proposed openstack/airship-promenade master: [WIP] Enabled AppArmor for K8s Proxy https://review.openstack.org/602444 | 16:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Change image update logic to latest in quay.io https://review.openstack.org/602418 | 16:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Roman Gorshunov proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: New option --out-file, fixes for retries logic https://review.openstack.org/603395 | 16:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 19:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Matt McEuen proposed openstack/airship-specs master: Spec: Pegleg encryption and decryption https://review.openstack.org/603473 | 19:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Sangeet Gupta proposed openstack/airship-promenade master: APISERVER for webhook https://review.openstack.org/595263 | 19:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Sangeet Gupta proposed openstack/airship-promenade master: APISERVER for webhook https://review.openstack.org/595263 | 20:04 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-deckhand master: Adding api for revisions deep diffing https://review.openstack.org/595359 | 20:16 |
| *** munimeha1 has joined #airshipit | 20:31 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 21:21 |
| *** aaronsheffield has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Anthony Bellino proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Network Policy https://review.openstack.org/595266 | 21:34 |
| *** georgk has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | PRATEEK REDDY DODDA proposed openstack/airship-deckhand master: First push attempt https://review.openstack.org/603502 | 21:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-drydock master: (fix) Add nodeSelector to Drydock Pod https://review.openstack.org/602691 | 22:07 |
| openstackgerrit | Jenkins Uplifter proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Auto chart/image uplifts to latest https://review.openstack.org/603520 | 22:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: plugins: Add Armada subdag/operator for helm tests https://review.openstack.org/603236 | 22:48 |
| *** munimeha1 has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Jenkins pipeline for airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/592190 | 22:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: plugins: Add Armada subdag/operator for helm tests https://review.openstack.org/603236 | 23:18 |
| openstackgerrit | Drew Walters proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: wip: actions: Add Shipyard action to test all releases https://review.openstack.org/603237 | 23:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!